O-Level Reform

On the left, F/A-18E/F Super Hornets assigned to Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 22 sit on the flight line at Naval Air Station (NAS) Lemoore, and to the right, are Super Hornets assigned to VFA-154. (U.S. Navy photos by Andrea Watters)

Lemoore Strike Fighter Squadrons Returning More Super Hornets to Flight Line

EDITOR’S NOTE: Naval Aviation News staff writer Jeff Newman and I had the opportunity to visit Naval Air Station Lemoore the first week of April alongside our visual information counterparts to cover operational-level maintenance reforms for the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet at Strike Fighter Wing Pacific.

Aviation Electronics Technician (AT) 1st class Victor Perez, the leading petty officer for VFA-122’s avionics shop and one of the squadron’s crew leads, updates the status of his aircraft. (U.S. Navy photos by Andrea Watters)

O-level reform is one of five aspects of the Naval Sustainment System, which focuses resources and attention on improving readiness across the fleet.

What stood out to us was the openness and willingness of squadron leaders and maintainers to embrace the opportunity to incorporate change, despite some initial resistance. Whether those improvements were recommendations from an industry partner—the Boston Consulting Group—or initiated by the squadrons themselves, leadership took control of the reforms. “We created our own destiny. We saw the opportunity to incorporate changes we had wanted to make,” said Maintenance Officer Cmdr. Kelly Borden, Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 122.

We witnessed two recurring themes: the use of visual displays throughout the hangars used to track status and personnel, and the benefits of crew leads—empowered petty officers assigned to oversee aircraft throughout the inspection process. We met several of those petty officers, who were inspired by the responsibility to improve communication and efficiency. All were proud of the job they were doing and eager to share their experiences.

What follows is a series of articles on reform initiatives at Master Jet Base, NAS Lemoore, and the efforts of VFA-22 and 122, the first two squadrons to take on the challenge. Of course, no overview of Lemoore would be complete without introducing the Naval Aviation Maintenance Center for Excellence and the role it plays in fleet readiness.

To follow the latest news articles, videos and podcasts on NSS reforms, visit www.navy.mil/local/nss. —Andrea Watters

Two Navy Super Hornet squadrons at Naval Air Station (NAS) Lemoore, California, have reduced maintenance turnaround times and are boosting aircraft readiness as part of Naval Aviation’s maintenance reform initiatives under the Naval Sustainment System (NSS).

he NSS initiative leverages best practices from commercial industry to help reform aspects of Naval Aviation’s fleet readiness centers, organizational-level (O-level) maintenance, supply chain, engineering and maintenance organizations and governance processes. Initially, the NSS is concentrating on getting the Navy F/A-18 Super Hornet fleet healthy before rolling out the approach to every Navy and Marine Corps aircraft.

Strike Fighter Squadrons (VFA) 22 and 122 were the first to implement O-level maintenance reforms following visits from commercial aviation consultants in December and January.

Reforms include assigning crew leads to manage the maintenance on each aircraft and reorganizing hangar spaces, parts cages and tools.

Squadrons Empower Petty Officers

The most significant change has been the delegation of ownership over each aircraft in for repairs from the squadrons’ maintenance material control officers, or MMCOs, to individual crew leads comprised mostly of first-class petty officers.

Traditionally, MMCOs must keep track of the status of each aircraft in for maintenance as well as the Sailors working on them, and that’s in addition to deciding what maintenance actions are required for each jet and which aircraft are safe to release for flight. Assigning junior-level crew leads to each jet removes some of that burden from the MMCOs and has led to improved communication and increased accountability.

“The crew leads are not making the maintenance decisions; that’s still done by the maintenance controllers, but what it allows for is it sheds those maintenance control chiefs of having to know every status of every jet, of every person, all day long,” said Lt. Cmdr. Brandon Michaelis, O-level Reform Champion for Commander, Naval Air Forces (CNAF). “So, they can focus on releasing safe aircraft by empowering those first-class petty officers, who can now own that process and know where the people are, know the status of the parts, and brief that up the line.”

For the petty officers accustomed to doing their job a certain way, reform did not come easy. But the benefits have been evident, said Aviation Electronics Technician 1st class Victor Perez, the leading petty officer for VFA-122’s avionics shop and one of the squadron’s selected crew leads.

“At first the changes didn’t feel productive because we didn’t really understand it, but now that we’ve had some time with it, it’s definitely helped improve our processes and communication,” Perez said.

From left, AT2 Joshua Cornell, AT3 Alfredo Balbuena and AT3 Gianni Ireland assigned to VFA-122 perform a cockpit inspection during an 84-day inspection. (U.S. Navy photos by Andrea Watters)

Used to focusing exclusively on avionics, Perez said serving as a crew lead has forced him to approach the maintenance of his assigned aircraft more holistically. The increased responsibility of bringing an entire jet back online ultimately leads to a greater sense of accomplishment, he said.

“You get kind of personal with an aircraft,” he added. “Some aircraft are easy, and some are a struggle to get through. Rather than working on a jet for a couple hours to complete the one thing assigned to your shop and then moving on to the next jet, this way you take more ownership toward completing the whole thing.”

In some cases, exceptional second-class petty officers have also been considered for crew lead, including Aviation Electrician’s Mate 2nd Class Michaela Zadra, a member of VFA-22’s quality assurance division. Having crew leads that can focus on individual jets—and communicate with the various maintenance shops—relieves maintenance control from having to keep near-constant track of as many as a dozen aircraft at a time, Zadra said.

“Crew leads have cut down on empty communication, so now I, as a maintainer who is not stuck behind a maintenance control desk, can walk around to each shop and talk to them personally,” she said. “There’s a lot more communication one-on-one, instead of one-to-one-to-one and then to maintenance control. It’s definitely helped with communication and productivity with the jets.”

In tandem with the crew lead concept has been the utilization of a whiteboard alongside each aircraft that informs anyone passing by as to the jet’s status. Information on the boards includes the names of the crew chief and additional personnel assigned to the aircraft, what maintenance is needed, and the expected completion date.

“If you physically walk through one of our hangars today, you can tell which ones have been reformed and which ones haven’t,” said Vice Adm. DeWolfe H. Miller, III, CNAF. “You know the exact status of that airplane, you know who’s working on that airplane and when they expect that airplane to be up. There’s going to be a crew lead who has that ownership.”

In addition, the two squadrons have begun treating the spaces around each Super Hornet in their hangars as dedicated workspaces, with all necessary tools and parts kept beside the aircraft rather than back in one of the various maintenance shops.

“We’re now treating the airplane a little more, as an analogy, like a patient getting surgery,” Miller said. “I am the doctor as the maintainer, and I said, ‘scalpel,’ and my tool is right there. What we’re seeing with that sort of approach, having our tools next to the airplane, having our status board next to the airplane, everything is going to the point of action being around that airframe, and we’re seeing a really significant improvement in our mission capable rates.”

Both squadrons have also begun keeping larger parts in a centralized “parts cage” in the hangar, dramatically reducing the amount of time Sailors spend traversing the hangar in search of equipment rather than with their hands on an aircraft.

“It may be five minutes here or five minutes there, but over the course of a day across all those technicians, that’s a lot of time saved by having those parts close to where the job is being done,” Michaelis said.

The 84-day Corrosion Inspection

Left, Aviation Structural Mechanic (AM) Airman Daniel Thomas repairs the wing of a F/A-18 Super Hornet. (U.S. Navy photos by Andrea Watters)

Together, the changes have helped the squadrons achieve one of the first goals of O-level reform—reducing the turnaround time for routine 84-day corrosion inspections down from 10 to 14 days to three days.

The 84-day inspection, so called because Super Hornets receive one every 84 days, is one of the most common checks conducted on the jet and is officially supposed to take three days.

“Our average is about 10 to 14 days,” Miller said. “It’s really important for us to put some discipline into achieving these checks on a predictable three-day pattern.”

After meeting with consultants, VFA-22 was the first squadron to pilot reforms aimed at reducing the 84-day inspection time.

“They were able to do it in two-and-a-half shifts, and as we’ve been going through the process with other squadrons, we realize that yes, three days in itself is sufficient, once we weed out the inefficiencies,” said Lt. Hasely Clarke, assistant maintenance officer for Strike Fighter Wing Pacific (SFWP).

Clarke said many of those inefficiencies arose from work centers waiting on one another to be finished with an aircraft before beginning their own tasks. “There was a lot of waiting time in between,” he said.

Time management, communication and multitasking between shops have all improved following the O-level reform, Zadra said, noting shops were encouraged to identify which of their tasks could be performed alongside another’s simultaneously. For instance, Zadra said she can check the lights in the cockpit from the side of the jet while someone from the avionics shop inspects instrumentation inside the cockpit.

“It cuts down a lot on worker hours, so we can minimize the time on the inspection,” she said.

Above, AT2 Travis Weirich and AT2 Jeremy Nestor, assigned to VFA-122, reinstall avionics components. (U.S. Navy photos by Andrea Watters)

Initial Skepticism

A former MMCO, Michaelis said he was skeptical of the O-level reforms when they were initially proposed, but has come around after seeing how VFA-22 and VFA-122 have put the reforms into practice.

“It’s been a tough pill to swallow, to see how inefficient [it was] even when I was in that position, even though I thought we were on point every single time,” he said. “To now look back and go, ‘Wow, there were a lot of places where I could have improved.’ So, that’s what’s made me a believer, is being able to look in hindsight and realize there’s tons of this stuff that I wish I had when I was an MMCO.”

Michaelis said the plan is to take the reforms to VFA squadrons at NAS Oceana, Virginia, before rolling them out across the Super Hornet community and, ultimately, to other platforms.

“As we migrate this and expand it across all type-model-series, I’m excited about what this is going to do for our future,” Miller said.

Further evidence of the reform’s efficacy will come when squadrons can keep their Sailors on normal work schedules while preparing for deployments, Michaelis said.

“Before we go on detachments or on deployment, we often work Sailors 12 [hours] on, 12 [hours] off, sometimes seven days a week,” he said. “The proof is when, on a Thursday, we can let our people out for a three-day weekend because our jets are up and ready to go, and we saw that recently in one of our transformed squadrons.”

Jeff Newman is a staff writer for Naval Aviation News.


Master Jet Base NAS Lemoore

Two F-35C Lightning II aircraft attached to the “Argonauts” of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 147 fly in formation over Naval Air Station Lemoore. (U.S. Navy photo by Chief MC Shannon E. Renfroe)

Home to F/A-18E/F and F-35C Squadrons

As the Navy’s largest master jet base, Naval Air Station (NAS) Lemoore, California, hosts the Navy’s entire fighter/attack capability on the West Coast and is at the forefront of training aircrew and maintainers.

The air station spans 19,225 acres, including 11,000 acres of leased farmland, and is home to Commander, Strike Fighter Wing Pacific (CSFWP) and its 16 Super Hornet strike fighter squadrons, fleet replacement squadron (FRS) Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 122 and newly established Commander, Joint Strike Fighter Wing (CJSFW) with its FRS VFA-125. In February 2019, VFA-147 became the Navy’s first operational F-35C Lightning II squadron.

The first F-35C arrived at NAS Lemoore in January 2017, and at the same time, the VFA-125 “Rough Raiders” were reactivated as the FRS for the platform.

To support the F-35C program, several facilities have been added or remodeled to accommodate maintenance and training, including a pilot fit facility, centralized engine repair facility, pilot training center and an upgraded hangar.

“All F-35C fleet operations are currently single-sited at NAS Lemoore, making it the focal point for Navy’s newest strike fighter capability. Lemoore is the only naval air station where both fourth- and fifth-generation squadrons will be co-located,” said Capt. Max McCoy, commodore, CJSFW. “The addition of the F-35C to existing carrier air wing capability here ensures that we can operate and win in contested battlespace now and well into the future.”

The base is separated into two sides—an operations section that includes the aircraft hangars and two offset parallel 13,500-foot runways—and an administrative side that includes family housing, medical, exchange, commissary, and morale, welfare and recreation facilities.

Fleet Readiness Center West, Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training Unit and Strike Fighter Weapons School Pacific are also located here..

Background

In the mid-1950s, the Chief of Naval Operations conducted a survey to find the best location for the next master jet base. The master jet base at the time, Moffett Federal Airfield in northern California, was deemed unsuitable for expansion because of the nearby increase in urban growth. The survey concluded Lemoore’s rural location in a rich agricultural area made it ideal for unimpeded flight training.

“Lemoore is in very close proximity to some of the best training ranges available in the Navy,” said Cmdr. Chris Fisher, NAS Lemoore executive officer. “As technology has evolved, the amount of airspace needed to develop tactics and train our aircrew has increased, and Lemoore can accommodate that.”

The military operating area directly over the airfield allows aircrew to execute flight carrier practice landings without having to modify flight patterns, which other squadrons at air stations in more urban areas must do.

Over the years, the squadrons and aircraft based at NAS Lemoore have changed, but their mission has remained the same—provide infrastructure, support and services that enable CSFWP, and now CJSFW, to conduct operations in support of national tasking.
— Andrea Watters